TSTP Solution File: PUZ140^2 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : PUZ140^2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v6.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May  5 08:49:27 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.22s 0.39s
% Output   : Refutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   17
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   39 (  10 unt;  11 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   81 (  41 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  106 (  28   ~;  15   |;  11   &;  49   @)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   2 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   19 (  19   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   12 (   9 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   35 (   0   ^  23   !;  10   ?;  35   :)
%                                         (   2  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   0  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    beverage: $tType ).

thf(type_def_6,type,
    syrup: $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    syrup: $tType ).

thf(func_def_1,type,
    beverage: $tType ).

thf(func_def_2,type,
    coffee: beverage ).

thf(func_def_3,type,
    mix: beverage > syrup > beverage ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    coffee_mixture: syrup > beverage ).

thf(func_def_5,type,
    hot: beverage > $o ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    vEPSILON: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 > $o ) > X0 ) ).

thf(func_def_10,type,
    sK0: ( syrup > beverage ) > syrup ).

thf(func_def_12,type,
    ph2: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(f33,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f27,f29,f32]) ).

thf(f32,plain,
    ~ spl1_2,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f31]) ).

thf(f31,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl1_2 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f30]) ).

thf(f30,plain,
    ( ( coffee != coffee )
    | ~ spl1_2 ),
    inference(superposition,[],[f26,f17]) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ! [X0: syrup] :
      ( coffee
      = ( mix @ coffee @ X0 ) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f15,f16]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ( coffee_mixture
    = ( mix @ coffee ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,axiom,
    ( coffee_mixture
    = ( mix @ coffee ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.MO0sHVP8rE/Vampire---4.8_16047',coffee_mixture_definition) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ! [X0: syrup] :
      ( coffee
      = ( coffee_mixture @ X0 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ! [X0: syrup] :
      ( ( coffee
        = ( coffee_mixture @ X0 ) )
      & ( ( hot @ ( coffee_mixture @ X0 ) )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f8]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ! [X0: syrup] :
      ( ( hot @ ( coffee_mixture @ X0 ) )
      & ( coffee
        = ( coffee_mixture @ X0 ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0: syrup] :
      ( ( hot @ ( coffee_mixture @ X0 ) )
      & ( coffee
        = ( coffee_mixture @ X0 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.MO0sHVP8rE/Vampire---4.8_16047',coffee_and_syrup_is_hot_coffee) ).

thf(f26,plain,
    ( ! [X0: syrup > beverage] :
        ( coffee
       != ( X0 @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) ) )
    | ~ spl1_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f25]) ).

thf(f25,plain,
    ( spl1_2
  <=> ! [X0: syrup > beverage] :
        ( coffee
       != ( X0 @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) ) ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_2])]) ).

thf(f29,plain,
    spl1_1,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f28,f21]) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ( spl1_1
  <=> ( $true
      = ( hot @ coffee ) ) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_1])]) ).

thf(f28,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( hot @ coffee ) ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f18,f17]) ).

thf(f18,plain,
    ! [X0: syrup] :
      ( ( hot @ ( mix @ coffee @ X0 ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f14,f16]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ! [X0: syrup] :
      ( ( hot @ ( coffee_mixture @ X0 ) )
      = $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

thf(f27,plain,
    ( ~ spl1_1
    | spl1_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f19,f25,f21]) ).

thf(f19,plain,
    ! [X0: syrup > beverage] :
      ( ( coffee
       != ( X0 @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) ) )
      | ( $true
       != ( hot @ coffee ) ) ),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f13]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ! [X2: beverage,X0: syrup > beverage] :
      ( ( ( hot @ X2 )
       != $true )
      | ( coffee != X2 )
      | ( ( X0 @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) )
       != X2 ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ! [X0: syrup > beverage,X2: beverage] :
      ( ( ( hot @ X2 )
       != $true )
      | ( coffee != X2 )
      | ( ( X0 @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) )
       != X2 ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f10,f11]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ! [X0: syrup > beverage] :
      ( ? [X1: syrup] :
        ! [X2: beverage] :
          ( ( ( hot @ X2 )
           != $true )
          | ( coffee != X2 )
          | ( ( X0 @ X1 )
           != X2 ) )
     => ! [X2: beverage] :
          ( ( ( hot @ X2 )
           != $true )
          | ( coffee != X2 )
          | ( ( X0 @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) )
           != X2 ) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ! [X0: syrup > beverage] :
    ? [X1: syrup] :
    ! [X2: beverage] :
      ( ( ( hot @ X2 )
       != $true )
      | ( coffee != X2 )
      | ( ( X0 @ X1 )
       != X2 ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ~ ? [X0: syrup > beverage] :
      ! [X1: syrup] :
      ? [X2: beverage] :
        ( ( ( X0 @ X1 )
          = X2 )
        & ( ( hot @ X2 )
          = $true )
        & ( coffee = X2 ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f6]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ~ ? [X0: syrup > beverage] :
      ! [X1: syrup] :
      ? [X2: beverage] :
        ( ( hot @ X2 )
        & ( coffee = X2 )
        & ( ( X0 @ X1 )
          = X2 ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X1: syrup > beverage] :
      ! [X0: syrup] :
      ? [X2: beverage] :
        ( ( hot @ X2 )
        & ( coffee = X2 )
        & ( ( X1 @ X0 )
          = X2 ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f3]) ).

thf(f3,conjecture,
    ? [X1: syrup > beverage] :
    ! [X0: syrup] :
    ? [X2: beverage] :
      ( ( hot @ X2 )
      & ( coffee = X2 )
      & ( ( X1 @ X0 )
        = X2 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.MO0sHVP8rE/Vampire---4.8_16047',there_is_hot_coffee) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13  % Problem    : PUZ140^2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v6.4.0.
% 0.03/0.15  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 18:02:23 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.36  This is a TH0_THM_EQU_NAR problem
% 0.15/0.36  Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.MO0sHVP8rE/Vampire---4.8_16047
% 0.22/0.38  % (16226)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2999ds/183Mi)
% 0.22/0.38  % (16228)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2999ds/27Mi)
% 0.22/0.38  % (16227)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 0.22/0.38  % (16231)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2999ds/275Mi)
% 0.22/0.38  % (16232)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2999ds/18Mi)
% 0.22/0.38  % (16230)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.22/0.39  % (16231)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.22/0.39  % (16231)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.39  % (16231)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.22/0.39  % (16231)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.22/0.39  
% 0.22/0.39  
% 0.22/0.39  % (16231)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.22/0.39  % (16231)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.22/0.39  % (16231)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.22/0.39  % (16231)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.39  % (16231)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.39  % (16228)First to succeed.
% 0.22/0.39  % (16230)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.22/0.39  % (16230)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.39  % (16230)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.22/0.39  % (16230)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.22/0.39  % (16230)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.22/0.39  
% 0.22/0.39  % (16230)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.22/0.39  % (16230)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.22/0.39  % (16230)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.22/0.39  % (16230)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.39  % (16230)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.39  % (16229)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.22/0.39  % (16226)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.22/0.39  % (16232)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.22/0.39  % (16228)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.22/0.39  % SZS status Theorem for Vampire---4
% 0.22/0.39  % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.39  % (16228)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.39  % (16228)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.22/0.39  % (16228)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.22/0.39  
% 0.22/0.39  % (16228)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.22/0.39  % (16228)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.22/0.39  % (16228)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.22/0.39  % (16228)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.39  % (16228)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.39  % (16223)Success in time 0.007 s
% 0.22/0.39  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------